| 
 enlarge | Directors: Hamilton Luske, Wilfred Jackson, Clyde Geronimi
Actors: Bobby Driscoll, Kathryn Beaumont, Hans Conried, Bill Thompson, Heather Angel
Studio: Walt Disney Video
Category: DVD
List Price: $359.00
Buy New: $308.93
You Save: $50.07 (14%)
New (5) Used (4) from $170.00
Rating:  73 reviews
Sales Rank: 57244
Format: Animated, Box Set, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dvd-video, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), French (Original Language), Spanish (Original Language)
Rating: G (General Audience)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 737
Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
Picture Format: Academy Ratio
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
ISBN: 0788820532
UPC: 717951007209
EAN: 9780788820533
ASIN: B00002CF5X
Theatrical Release Date: 1999
Release Date: December 10, 1999
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: ** FREE Priority Shipping Upgrade ** RARE and Out of Print ** GUARANTEED factory sealed NEW, Authentic DISNEY copyright protected U.S. release (Region 1) exactly as pictured and listed. NOT an import or bootleg!! In Stock NOW. Shipped Fast First Class. -- International Orders Welcome -- LIMITED QUANTITY. TRUSTED SELLER - Check out my feedback and purchase with confidence!!! --- Be wary of low rated sellers!!! --- CLICK ON OUR NAME to access our storefront and view our complete inventory.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Anthology? Nothing now August 9, 2003
14 out of 24 found this review helpful
I was surprised to read that many of the DVDs in this collection are no even in widescreen. They dared to charge this much for a collection and put in the cheaper versions as well. Watching movies in their original widescreen version is one of the major reasons why DVD format is awesome. It is a real dissapointment that they couldn't "spring" for the widescreen that usually runs [a little] more, boo hoo. I would NOT recommend this set, it is WAY over prices, and you will miss half of some of these movies seeing them in "pan & scan". And don't get me started on why "The Lion King" was not included but "The Lion King 2" was!!!!!
 GOOD, BUT TOO EXPENSIVE! April 30, 2003
3 out of 10 found this review helpful
This set has many classics but this is a real [expensive]!Who ever heard of 9 movies for ... dollars anyway?If you buy these movies separately it will be a much smaller price.I still give it 5 stars because of the great movies inside the package.People keep putting this down because they didnt include ALL of the classics but keep in mind that the title says disney dvd collecters set 1!...?
The only other flaw is that they put THE LION KING 2 in the set even though its the first set and they havent included the original LION KING yet.Go ahead and buy this set if you have a lot of money, you wont be dissapointed
A real steal March 22, 2003
... For that price you get several great movies. When we first bought the set, our son was not old enough to enjoy many of the movies. However, when we went on the Disney Cruise he discovered Hercules and he was so excited to see that he had it when we got home. And Mulan is also a great movie - our son loves Mushu. ...
 Hey Disney; need a dictionary? January 22, 2003
6 out of 7 found this review helpful
Disney Buena Vista needs to get his facts straight and is in desperate need of an update about the meaning of the word "classic".
In my dictionary, it says something in the line of: "Something that has sentimental or special value, preferably from some time ago."
Disney regards just about everything they release as a classic. It's wrong, and they know it; they just don't want to see it.Let's take a look at some Disney-flics I regard as a Classic:
Pinocchio fits that bill, Snow White too, 101 Dalmatians, Aladdin (Robin Williams is just great), Jungle Book... See? they made enough films that can carry the "Classic"-title with pride.
Their sequels however, are not.
You just can't make a sequel to a fairie-tale, let alone call it a classic. Those two things just don't mix.
Sequels to a fairie-tale is just greedy moneymaking. Fine by me: they need money to create the bigger movies. But PLEASE Disney; don't call these cheap ripoffs classics, and don't put them in an overpriced box, hoping that customers overlook The Lion King II (or rather; The Lyin' King; Kimba, anyone?) and Hercules, alltough that's still a funny movie, but not great. So, my advice to you who reads this review: just buy the movies that you like, and leave this miserable failure on the shelves, letting Disney know they just can't pull anything off.
Hey Disney; need a dictionary? January 22, 2003
12 out of 14 found this review helpful
Disney Buena Vista needs to get his facts straight and is in desperate need of an update about the meaning of the word "classic".
In my dictionary, it says something in the line of: "Something that has sentimental or special value, preferably from some time ago."
Disney regards just about everything they release as a classic. It's wrong, and they know it; they just don't want to see it.Let's take a look at some Disney-flics I regard as a Classic:
Pinocchio fits that bill, Snow White too, 101 Dalmatians, Aladdin (Robin Williams is just great), Jungle Book... See? they made enough films that can carry the "Classic"-title with pride.
Their sequels however, are not.
You just can't make a sequel to a fairie-tale, let alone call it a classic. Those two things just don't mix.
Sequels to a fairie-tale is just greedy moneymaking. Fine by me: they need money to create the bigger movies. But PLEASE Disney; don't call these cheap ripoffs classics, and don't put them in an overpriced box, hoping that customers overlook The Lion King II (or rather; The Lyin' King; Kimba, anyone?) and Hercules, alltough that's still a funny movie, but not great. So, my advice to you who reads this review: just buy the movies that you like, and leave this miserable failure on the shelves, letting Disney know they just can't pull anything off.
|
|
|
